ASP.NET Core JWT Refresh Token Rotation

Refresh token rotation means every successful refresh consumes the presented refresh token, issues a new one, and treats reuse of an old token as theft that revokes the entire token family.

Login ──► refresh_A (family F1)
              │
Refresh with A ──► access + refresh_B (A revoked)
              │
Attacker uses A ──► REUSE ──► revoke ALL of family F1

Picture a hotel key card: each checkout issues a new card and deactivates the old one. If someone tries the old card after you already checked in with the new one, security assumes theft and locks the whole reservation.

New to this → stay here. Angular concurrent 401s → 401 refresh queue. HttpOnly cookie storage → refresh token cookie. JWT checklist → ASP.NET Core JWT auth. Interview prep → If an interviewer asks.

What refresh token rotation actually means

Rotation means: every successful refresh consumes the presented refresh token and issues a new refresh token. The previous value must not work again.

Without rotation, a stolen refresh token is valid until expiry. With rotation and reuse detection, a stolen token that is used after the legitimate client already rotated it becomes a signal: treat the token family as compromised and revoke it.

I use three identifiers in the store:

1. Token id — unique row for this refresh value (store a hash, never the raw token)
2. Family id — shared across rotations of the same login session
3. User id — who this session belongs to

When reuse is detected, revoke every row in that family, not only the reused row. The thief and the real user both lose the session. That is the point. The real user signs in again; the thief does not keep a silent foothold.

Access token vs refresh token (do not mix their jobs)

Token	Typical lifetime I start with	Stored where (API)	Sent how
Access JWT	5–15 minutes for internet-facing SPAs	Not stored after issuance (stateless validation)	Authorization: Bearer
Refresh	Hours to a few days, product-dependent	Hashed in SQL (or equivalent) with expiry + family	Body, or better: httpOnly cookie

Access tokens stay short so a leak is time-boxed. Refresh tokens stay server-tracked so you can kill a session. If you issue a 24-hour JWT "because refresh was hard," you skipped the hard part and kept the risk.

On healthcare admin portals I have shipped, access tokens were shorter than on internal ops tools behind VPN. The code pattern was the same. The policy was not.

A storage model that supports reuse detection

public sealed class RefreshToken
{
    public Guid Id { get; set; }
    public Guid FamilyId { get; set; }
    public Guid UserId { get; set; }
    public required string TokenHash { get; set; }
    public DateTimeOffset CreatedAt { get; set; }
    public DateTimeOffset ExpiresAt { get; set; }
    public DateTimeOffset? RevokedAt { get; set; }
    public Guid? ReplacedByTokenId { get; set; }
    public string? CreatedByIp { get; set; }
    public string? UserAgentHash { get; set; }
}

Rules I enforce in one service, not in controllers:

• Persist SHA-256 (or stronger) of the refresh token plus a server-side pepper from Key Vault. If the database leaks, the raw token is not sitting in a column named RefreshToken.
• Never log the raw token. Log FamilyId and UserId.
• Index (TokenHash) unique, and (FamilyId, RevokedAt) for family revoke.
• On password change, admin lock, or "log out everywhere," revoke all families for that user.

User-agent and IP are signals, not identity. NATs and mobile networks will lie to you. I record them for incident review. I do not auto-revoke solely because the IP changed — that trains users to hate your product.

Refresh endpoint behavior

public sealed record RefreshRequest(string RefreshToken);

public async Task<IResult> RefreshAsync(
    RefreshRequest request,
    HttpContext http,
    IRefreshTokenService tokens,
    CancellationToken ct)
{
    var presented = request.RefreshToken;
    if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(presented))
        return Results.Unauthorized();

    var outcome = await tokens.RotateAsync(presented, http.Connection.RemoteIpAddress?.ToString(), ct);

    return outcome switch
    {
        RotateSuccess s => Results.Ok(new
        {
            accessToken = s.AccessToken,
            refreshToken = s.RefreshToken,
            expiresIn = s.AccessExpiresInSeconds
        }),
        RotateReuseDetected => Results.Unauthorized(),
        RotateInvalid => Results.Unauthorized(),
        _ => Results.Unauthorized()
    };
}

I return 401 for invalid, expired, revoked, and reuse. Do not return 200 with { success: false }. Do not return 403. Angular interceptors should treat this as "session is dead," not "try a different permission."

On reuse detection I still return 401 to the caller, and I revoke the family in the same transaction. Then I write a security log event. In healthcare work that event is an audit row without PHI — session and user identifiers only.

Rotation algorithm (the part tutorials skip)

Inside RotateAsync:

1. Hash the presented token. Look up the row.
2. If missing, expired, or already revoked and not a reuse of a replaced token → RotateInvalid.
3. If the row is revoked because it was replaced (has ReplacedByTokenId) → reuse. Revoke the family. RotateReuseDetected.
4. Otherwise, in a transaction:
   • Insert a new row (new id, same family, new hash, new expiry)
   • Set RevokedAt and ReplacedByTokenId on the old row
   • Issue a new access JWT
   • Return the new raw refresh token once

Concurrency matters. Two Angular tabs can refresh at the same instant. If both pass step 2 before either writes, you get two valid children or a false reuse alarm.

I serialize rotation per family with a SQL transaction and a row lock on the current token:

await using var tx = await db.Database.BeginTransactionAsync(ct);

var current = await db.RefreshTokens
    .FromSql($"SELECT * FROM RefreshTokens WITH (UPDLOCK, ROWLOCK) WHERE TokenHash = {hash}")
    .SingleOrDefaultAsync(ct);

If you are on PostgreSQL, use FOR UPDATE. If you skip the lock, you will debug "random logouts" for a week and blame Angular.

A slightly softer approach used on one eCommerce admin: if two rotations race within a 2–3 second window and both present the same still-active token, issue one successor and return it to both. I only do that when product owners refuse false logouts more than they fear a tiny race. Reuse of an already replaced token still kills the family. Document the choice.

JWT claims on the access token

Keep access tokens boring:

• sub — user id
• iss / aud — validated explicitly
• roles or a small set of policy claims
• jti — useful if you later add a short-lived denylist for logout-before-expiry

Do not put refresh family ids, PHI, emails you do not need, or "the whole user object" in the JWT. Angular will decode it. So will every XSS bug.

Signing: asymmetric keys (RS256) once you have more than one API trusting the issuer. Symmetric keys are fine for a single API if the key lives in Key Vault and is long enough. Clock skew: one minute, not the default 5 minutes that keeps expired tokens alive.

Best practices checklist (this is the "jwt refresh token best practices" section)

Use this as a go-live review, not as decoration:

• Access JWT TTL is short and written down
• Refresh tokens are hashed at rest
• Rotation is mandatory — old refresh value fails after success
• Reuse of a rotated token revokes the family
• Refresh failures are 401, not 200
• Logout hits the API and revokes the family (cookie or body)
• Password reset revokes all families
• Angular has one in-flight refresh (interceptor notes)
• CORS + credentials are correct if the refresh token is a cookie
• Tokens never appear in application logs or exception messages

If you only implement half of this, implement hashing + family revoke. Rotation without reuse detection still helps. Reuse detection without hashing is theater.

Angular contract (so the API design does not fight the SPA)

The API should assume:

• Many requests 401 at once when the access token expires
• The SPA will call refresh once, then retry
• A failed refresh means redirect to login, not a retry storm

If you store refresh tokens in JSON bodies, the SPA must hold them. That is why I prefer httpOnly cookies for refresh on same-site or carefully configured cross-site setups, and why a BFF is the stronger long-term shape for public internet SPAs.

Do not refresh on 403. If your API uses 401 for "wrong role," you will rotate tokens because a nurse opened an admin route. Fix status codes first.

Example: what I test before I call it done

1. Login → refresh → old refresh returns 401 → new refresh works
2. Use old refresh again → 401 and all family rows revoked
3. Two parallel refreshes with a lock → one or two successor tokens, no stuck user
4. Expired refresh → 401, no new access token
5. Logout → refresh 401
6. User B's refresh cannot be used as user A

I test with a real Angular client, not only Swagger. Swagger does not stampede.

When not to build this yourself

If you already need SSO, external IdPs, or multiple first-party apps, a dedicated issuer (Identity vs OpenIddict vs IdentityServer, and MapIdentityApi vs JWT) may own refresh for you. You still need to understand rotation. You should not assume the default template did reuse detection.

Custom refresh is reasonable for a single ASP.NET Core API plus one Angular admin. It becomes a liability when every new app copies the token table.

If an interviewer asks

"What is refresh token reuse detection?"

Strong answer: When a client presents a refresh token that was already rotated (revoked with ReplacedByTokenId), treat it as theft. Revoke the entire token family — all sessions from that login chain. Both thief and legitimate user must re-authenticate. That is the point of rotation plus reuse detection.

"Why hash refresh tokens in the database?"

Strong answer: Same reason as passwords. A DB dump should not mint sessions. Store SHA-256 of the token plus a server pepper. Never log raw refresh values.

"How do you handle concurrent refresh from two tabs?"

Strong answer: Serialize rotation per family with a database row lock (UPDLOCK / FOR UPDATE). Without a lock, two tabs can race and trigger false reuse alarms or double successors. Angular must also single-flight refresh on the client.